Rights Issue of Shares

 

Rights Issue of Shares

In an earlier article we have seen what a Bonus Issue of Shares is. In the current article we try to understand about Rights Issue of Shares.

One of the dictionary definition of the word Right is “legal entitlement to have”. When a person by virtue of his situation at a given point of time is entitled to something that “something” is called his right. Hence, we have Right to Freedom, Right to Equality, Right to information, Right to Property, Right to Privacy, Right to Constitutional remedies, etc.

In a capital market terminology “Rights issue of shares” means an existing company offering additional shares to its existing shareholders. This additional share offer is proportional to the shareholders current holding in the company.

 


The purpose of this article is only to give a basic idea. Readers are requested to refer to the Companies Act and other related law to understand the exact legal provisions.

Why this is called Rights? Or how this become a shareholders’ Right?

We know that shareholders are the ultimate owners of a company. When an investor purchases shares of a company from the share market or from the company or its promoters directly, what he actually buys is a portion of ownership capital of that company.

When the company requires additional funds to expand its business or for any other business purposes, it could raise such funds either by borrowing it from banks or financial institutions or from its owners. If the company decides to raise this additional capital from its owners, such owners would prefer to contribute the funds in the ratio of their ownership. They would want the ownership pattern / ratio of capital owned in the company to remain the same even after the new funds are pumped in. The offer of shares to the shareholders is therefore always in proportion to their existing holding, so that even after the new capital has been raised the original shareholding pattern remains the same.

Normally in a Rights issue, shares are offered at a discount to market price. This acts as an incentive to the existing shareholders to subscribe to their share.

It may sometimes happen that the existing shareholders may not have money with them to invest in their rights, or they may not want to commit additional funds in the company. In which case they have got an option to surrender or relinquish their “rights” by not subscribing to their shares or they can “renounce” the same in favour of another person for a price. This price is normally the difference between the issue price and the market price. In such a situation the ownership of this shareholder after the rights issue will reduce proportionately.

Let us understand this with a simple example.

Suppose A Ltd has a capital of Rs 20,000/- which was contributed by 5 shareholders equally when A Ltd started its business. This means each shareholder / owner has Rs 4,000/- worth of shares in the company.

A Ltd has now identified a new business-opportunity and requires another Rs 15,000/- worth of funds to invest in this new project. A Ltd has the option to raise this additional amount either from banks or financial institutions or it can raise this amount from its owners, i.e its 5 shareholders.

As an owner of A Ltd, it is now the Right of each of the 5 share holders to participate equally in the new fund-raising program of the company. If all the shareholders participate in this fund-raising and contribute their share fully i.e. Rs 3,000/- each, the new combined capital would be Rs 35,000/- (20000+15000) which would be held by each of the share holders to the extent of Rs 7,000/- (4000+3000) each.

 

OLD

OLD

NEW

NEW

1

20%

Rs 4,000

20%

Rs 7,000

2

20%

Rs 4,000

20%

Rs 7,000

3

20%

Rs 4,000

20%

Rs 7,000

4

20%

Rs 4,000

20%

Rs 7,000

5

20%

Rs 4,000

20%

Rs 7,000

TOTAL

100%

Rs 20,000

100%

Rs 35,000

 

If one of the share holders is not interested or is not in a position to contribute his share of Rs 3,000/- either fully or partially, he can renounce his share in favour of his co-owners who can subscribe to his share and increase their holding in the company. Assuming all the remaining shareholders subscribe to the renounced share equally the new share holding pattern would become 4 shareholders holding Rs 7,750/- each (4000+3000+750) and one shareholder who has not participated in the rights issue holding Rs 4,000/-.

The old share-holding ratio was 20% * 5 = 100% i.e. Rs 4,000 * 5 = Rs 20,000 and the new share-holding ratio would be (22.145%*4)+(11.42%*1)=100% i.e. Rs 7,750*4 = Rs 31,000 PLUS Rs 4,000*1 = Rs 4,000 totaling to Rs 35,000.

 

OLD

OLD

NEW

NEW

1

20%

Rs 4,000

11.420%

Rs 4,000

2

20%

Rs 4,000

22.145%

Rs 7,750

3

20%

Rs 4,000

22.145%

Rs 7,750

4

20%

Rs 4,000

22.145%

Rs 7,750

5

20%

Rs 4,000

22.145%

Rs 7,750

TOTAL

100%

Rs 20,000

100%

Rs 35,000

 

In the second case Shareholder No 1 has renounced his share in favour of the other shareholders who have all subscribed to the renounced shares in equal proportion. In case of listed companies, the shareholder has got the option to either fully or partially apply for the additional shares offered to him. Or fully or partially renounce the shares either in favour of existing shareholders or in favour of any member of the general public who can also become members of the company after they are allotted the renounced shares.

 

About the author 

Legal Heirs as per Hindu Succession Act

 

Legal Heirs as per Hindu Succession Act

Succession in the case of a Hindu Male dying intestate

 

In an earlier article on Wills we have seen what happens if a person dies intestate i.e. without making a Will. In such a situation, the person’s assets and properties get distributed as per the personal law or The Indian Succession Act. If a person belonging to the Hindu, Sikh, Jain or Buddhist community dies without making a Will, the Hindu Succession Act applies. In case of Muslims dying without making a Will, the personal succession law applies. In case of any persons other than above dying without making a Will, the Indian Succession Act applies.

The Hindu Succession Act lay down a specific formula as per which the assets and properties are to be distributed if an Indian Hindu dies without making a Will.

The purpose of this article is only to give a basic idea about how the law applies. Readers are requested to consult an Estate Planner or lawyer for their individual situations.

The Hindu Succession Act, as mentioned earlier applies to Hindus, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists. It applies to legitimate and illegitimate children and to converts and reconverts to this religion.

When a Hindu male dies without making a Will, the heirs would fall under the following categories, in that order.

(1)  Class I Heirs

(2)  Class II Heirs

(3)  Agnates

(4)  Cognates and

(5)  Government

 

(1)  Relatives belonging to Class I (see chart below) will first be eligible for the deceased Hindu male’s assets and properties. These are

 

 


 

Pictorially this can be depicted as follows.


Even a single member of Class I would have claim over a group of members from Class II.

 

(2)  If there are no heirs as mentioned in Class I, the heirs mentioned in Class II would be eligible for the intestate deceased Hindu Male’s assets and properties. These are

 


 

 Pictorially this can be depicted as follows.

 

 

(3)  If there are no members belonging to either Class I and Class II the properties and assets of a Hindu male dying intestate would devolve on a group of relatives who are classified as Agnates. Agnates are relatives (male or female) who trace their relationship with one another either through blood or by adoption through the male lineage. A person for instance is an agnate of his father’s brother’s son. Similarly father’s brother’s widow is also an agnate. What is important to note is that the relationship should be because of a male lineage.

 

(4)  If there are no members or relatives in either the Class I or Class II or the Agnates category, the assets would devolve on Cognates. Cognates are persons (male or female) who trace their relationship with one another either by blood or adoption not wholly through a male lineage. A person for instance is a cognate of his father’s sister’s son. Similarly one’s brother’s daughter’s son would become one’s cognate. What is important to note is that whenever a relationship with a female intervenes in the line, one becomes a cognate of another.

 

Even amongst Agnates and Cognates the order of succession is determined as per rules laid down.

 

(5)  If any of the above four categories of relatives are not available, the properties and assets of a Hindu male dying intestate would belong to the Government.

 

The hierarchy mentioned above is to be followed : 

Class I heirs, 

Class II heirs,   

Agnates,  

Cognates and 

finally  

Government.

 

About the Author